Microservice Pipeline: Filters, Pipes, Guards & Interceptors
Microservice Pipeline: Filters, Pipes, Guards & Interceptors
Microservice handlers still need validation, authorization, error mapping, and tracing. NestJS lets you use pipes, guards, interceptors, and exception filters in RPC contexts, but the response model differs from HTTP.
Core idea
This feature is about controlling how the application is organized and how it behaves at runtime. These are the points a developer should understand before using it in a real project:
- Pipes validate and transform message payloads before @MessagePattern handlers run.
- Guards can authorize messages based on payload metadata, headers, or broker context.
- Interceptors wrap handler execution and are useful for tracing, timing, and response mapping.
- RpcException communicates structured errors back through the microservice layer.
- Filters for microservices should emit transport-appropriate error payloads, not HTTP responses.
Practical example
The following example shows the idea in a practical NestJS project. The goal is not to memorize the snippet, but to understand where it belongs in the architecture:
Production checklist
- Use DTOs for message payloads, not anonymous objects.
- Map domain errors to stable machine-readable error codes.
- Add tracing interceptors to both client and server sides.
- Avoid throwing raw framework or database errors through broker responses.
Summary
This lesson covers an advanced NestJS area that matters when building enterprise applications. Focus on clear boundaries, testable behavior, and choosing the right tool for the context instead of using every feature everywhere.